I ran a quick poll on App.net to see which features of OS X Mavericks people were looking forward to the most. Keep in mind that this crowd skews nerd-heavy, which is why–despite having many options to choose from–only four features made it into the results.
I’ve been working on the next entry in my series on writing. It’s about capture, and–spoiler alert–I rely pretty heavily on Drafts.
It took me a while to fully understand why this app is so amazing. Since it’s such an essential tool for my next piece, I thought it might be a good idea to explain my ah-ha moment. If you’ve looked at Drafts before and didn’t understand it, maybe I can help you see why it’s such a handy piece of software.
Here’s the secret: text doesn’t live in Drafts. Drafts is temporary storage; it’s not Evernote, and I don’t believe it was ever intended to be anything of the sort.
Sure, it has a nifty sync service to synchronize all of your notes between your devices, which is great. But the real power in Drafts is speed combined with the ability to send stuff elsewhere. It’s a high-velocity conduit. I use it primarily to send text to either Dropbox or Evernote (and sometimes OmniFocus).
“I already have the Evernote app installed. And I can save text to Dropbox with Byword/iA Writer/some other editor.” – You, just now
Sure you can, but I’ll bet dollars to donuts that I can do it faster than you.
When I pick up my phone to jot something down, I never have to think, “Which app do I open? Where is this going to live? What type of thing am I making note of?” It all starts with Drafts, and once it’s written down, I can toss it into any number of lists, notebooks, or Dropbox folders with two taps. Drafts removes friction.1 It reduces the up-front cognitive load associated with persisting data in my outboard brain.
If you want to test the efficiency of any capture system, try getting an idea out of your head when your 18-month-old toddler is feeling particularly impatient. Drafts makes this possible for me. It’s earned a place in my dock on both my iPad and iPhone, and I don’t see it leaving anytime soon.
Again, these key-based systems are the norm, and–as was pointed out in this article–other messaging systems were forced to comply with government orders to institute man-in-he-middle interceptions. It wouldn’t be impossible for Apple to do the same.
That said, I’d be interested to know how they implemented this to make interception difficult. Sharing that knowledge with the industry might make us all safer while adding validity to their claims.
According to researchers who presented at the Hack the Box conference in Kuala Lumpur (via Macworld), it is actually possible for someone inside Apple to intercept messages because the company has access to public iMessage keys.
This isn’t a surprise–that’s just how encrypted messaging works. It’s Apple’s specific claim that they couldn’t decrypt any messages that’s going to draw the ire of the nerds.